Reviewer Information

Peer Review Process
This journal follows a double-anonymous peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. Reviewers are carefully selected to match their expertise with the manuscript’s subject area. Each review must demonstrate thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, offering constructive, evidence-based feedback that enhances the quality and scholarly value of the work.

Mission
The mission of the peer review process is to maintain excellence, integrity, and rigour in scholarly publications and research, ensuring that every published article meets the highest academic standards.

Vision
Our vision is to empower professionals and scholars in the field to contribute their unique and diverse perspectives, enriching the global body of knowledge through meaningful and balanced peer evaluation.

Values
The journal upholds diversity, respect, and scholarly integrity. We value reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback that aids author development and improves the manuscript’s clarity and impact. Our reviewers represent a wide range of organizations, disciplines, and cultural backgrounds worldwide.

Ethics
All aspects of the review process including invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviewer comments are strictly confidential. Reviewers must not disclose or share any part of the manuscript or review with others without explicit permission from the editors and authors. This confidentiality extends to other reviewers’ comments shared after the editorial decision. Reviewers are expected to uphold the highest ethical standards throughout the review process.